NCAA Basketball: What if March Madness worked like the FIFA World Cup?
By Dakota Cox
Pros
Same amount of games
This system would have 63 games, equal to the amount of a 64-team bracket.
Competition
If you have 32 teams, every game is a grueling competition. Top seeds could not take a game off. If the tie-breakers were done right, every minute of every game in the Group Stage would matter. Also, teams would have to work harder to earn positions in the Sweet 16, which makes Knockout Stage games more entertaining. A Cinderella story is great, but it’s not entertaining when they’re getting blown out by a 2-seed.
Experience
If you use this system, every team would be guaranteed three games, and they would average almost games per tournament experience. This would double the 1.97 games averaged by each team in the current configuration (excluding First Four games).
As this system continues, teams would gain more experience and become better equipped for the next season. This would be better for the players, fans, and NCAA.
Cons
No Cinderella Teams
Okay, this is the worst part about this system. Without so many teams, there aren’t the Loyola-Chicago’s or the UMBC’s of the tournament. However, this could be fixed by making a consolation bracket for the other 32 teams that would have been in March Madness beforehand. It’s not ideal, but it beats the heck out of the NIT.
It’s a Confusing System
I understand this system isn’t perfect. Casual fans might get confused with the groups and tie-breakers. But we’re allowed to get a little more complicated than a single-elimination bracket. And at the end of the day, all the fan needs to know is where to watch the game.
Next: Updated Preseason Top 25 for 2018-19
All in all, the NCAA could learn how to improve its tournament by taking a page from FIFA’s book. It comes with its flaws, but so does March Madness.