Busting Brackets
Fansided

Bracketology 2020: Examining mid-major basketball at-large profiles

NEW YORK, NY - MARCH 8: The NCAA Basketball Tournament Selection Committee meets on Wednesday afternoon, March 8, 2017 in New York City. The committee is gathered in New York to begin the five-day process of selecting and seeding the field of 68 teams for the NCAA MenÕs Basketball Tournament. The final bracket will be released on Sunday evening following the completion of conference tournaments. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
NEW YORK, NY - MARCH 8: The NCAA Basketball Tournament Selection Committee meets on Wednesday afternoon, March 8, 2017 in New York City. The committee is gathered in New York to begin the five-day process of selecting and seeding the field of 68 teams for the NCAA MenÕs Basketball Tournament. The final bracket will be released on Sunday evening following the completion of conference tournaments. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
1 of 10
Bracketology
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON – FEBRUARY 29: Dan Fotu #42 and Tanner Krebs #00 of the Saint Mary’s Gaels box out Corey Kispert #24 of the Gonzaga Bulldogs (Photo by William Mancebo/Getty Images)

As we near Selection Sunday and the NCAA Tournament Field of 68, the age-old Bracketology question of whether mid-major basketball teams get enough love from the Selection Committee will be in full swing. Which mid-major programs are in contention for an at-large selection from the Committee?

Every year around this time, college hoops junkies and Bracketology pundits rekindle the debate that rages throughout conference tournaments and into Selection Sunday and beyond: why does the Selection Committee hate mid-major basketball programs?

Now, to be fair, not everyone characterizes the debate in that way. For some, the issue is more along the lines of: why don’t mid-majors play anyone? Detractors retort with barbs about schedule strength and supporters lob verbal grenades about Power 5 schools being scared of losing. Rinse. Repeat. Hello March, my old friend!

Still, there are mid-majors that have become brands unto themselves and have shown the way for the next crop of burgeoning programs (here’s looking at you, Zags!). It is possible to be a mid-major program and have your body of work recognized by the Committee.

Just last year, Belmont, from the Ohio Valley Conference, received an at-large bid from the Committee, defeating Temple in the play-in round before falling to Maryland in a close 6-11 battle. And UNC Greensboro from the Southern Conference came oh-so-close to hearing its name called as an at-large selection before its dreams were dashed by the unexpected Pac-12 tournament championship run by Oregon.

As the automatic bids continue to be handed out this week, the pot from which the at-large Bracketology selections will be made will become clearer. Let’s examine the eight mid-major teams who may be evaluated for at-large selection by the Committee.

*All data through games completed March 9, 2020.*