Texas Tech Basketball: Red Raiders season review
By Doug Winkey
Texas Tech basketball had a surprisingly successful regular season followed by one of the most tumultuous offseasons of the early spring.
Texas Tech beat everyone’s expectations this year when they finished seventh in the Big 12 at 9-9 and made the NCAA Tournament. They went 19-13 overall with good wins over South Dakota State and Arkansas-Little Rock in the non-conference season.
Related Story: Baylor Bears season review
Their best win all year was a 84-66 thrashing of Baylor in Waco.
The Red Raiders didn’t end the season strongly though, as they lost to bottom-dweller TCU in the Big 12 Tournament and then fell to Butler in the first round of the NCAA tournament.
The Red Raiders had three Big-12 Honorable Mentions in Toddrick Gotcher, Aaron Ross, and Zach Smith. Tubby Smith was Big 12 Coach of the Year, but he bolted just this past week to Memphis.
In his place is former Little Rock and UNLV coach Chris Beard. This drama is happening right as the spring recruiting period has gone live.
The team didn’t finish quite as strongly as it could have given their competitiveness from the regular season, but there might finally be signs of hoops life in northwest Texas.
Final Season Grade: A-
So, what’s next in Lubbock?
Players Gone:
G – Toddrick Gotcher (10.9 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 2.2 apg, 1.0 spg)
G – Devaugntah Williams (10.8 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 1.6 apg)
F – Isaiah Manderson
Tech’s two best guards from this past season are gone, but they were also inconsistent.
More from Busting Brackets
- NCAA Basketball Recruiting: Analyzing top 4 teams for PF Jaxon Johnson
- NCAA Basketball Recruiting: Analyzing top 5 teams for top-100 SG Larry Johnson
- Oregon Basketball: Projected starting lineup and depth chart for 2023-24
- Big East Basketball: Ranking all head coaches going into 2023-24 season
- Florida State Basketball: Is Seminoles roster good enough to win in 2023-24?
Williams started as the point guard, but fell out of the starting lineup at the mid-way point of the season and would fluctuate from six points one night to 20 the next.
Gotcher was the team’s most notable sniper from long range (39%), but he shot just 6-of-20 over their final four contests.
Their guards were strong in terms of leadership, but there are also guards returning with far more potential.
Manderson was a forward with decent upside, but transferred to South Florida with a logjam at his position.
Players Returning:
G – Keenan Evans (8.7 ppg, 2.9 rpg, 2.9 apg, 1.0 spg)
G – Devon Thomas (2.4 ppg, 1.2 rpg, 1.4 apg)
G – C.J. Williamson (1.8 ppg)
G – Jordan Jackson (1.1 ppg)
F – Justin Gray (8.7 ppg, 3.7 rpg)
F – Aaron Ross (10.3 ppg, 4.5 rpg)
F – Zach Smith (10.0 ppg, 7.3 rpg, 1.8 apg, 1.5 bpg)
F – Matthew Temple (3.5 ppg, 1.7 rpg)
C – Norense Odiase (8.5 ppg, 4.2 rpg)
The key to next year’s success will be the frontcourt trio of Ross, Smith and Odiase. These three were typically TTU’s most consistent producers night in and night out. They’ll have a chance to make a major leap and be among the Big 12’s best front court rotation.
As far as guards go, the guys with the most potential are Evans and Thomas based on the most recent campaign. It’s hard to project Williamson, Jackson, and even lesser used players because they had to sit behind the two that just graduated, Gotcher and Williams.
The other star on the team is swing man, Justin Gray, who is probably Beard’s most dynamic athlete.
Who’s new:
G – Keon Clergeot (6’1″, 170 lbs)
So far it’s just Clergeot joining the team out of Auburndale, Florida next season. Evans is the likely starting point guard, but with very little solidified in the rest of the back court, the program’s lone recruit might sneak in there.
More from Big 12
- Kansas Basketball: Impact of Arterio Morris suspension for Jayhawks
- Kansas State Basketball: Will McNair Jr. continues late roster building
- Big 12 Basketball: Ranking all 16 programs after adding Arizona, ASU, Colorado and Utah
- Texas Basketball: Projected starting lineup and depth chart for 2023-24 season
- Kansas Basketball: Projected starting lineup and depth chart for 2023-24 season
Of course, spring recruiting has just begun and transfer season is in full force, so there might be other names that crop up in the coming weeks. Beard had almost every transfer looking at UNLV in his brief tenure, so he might get one or two of them to switch interest.
Overall, Texas Tech is in an interesting position. They lost the coach that returned them to a level of respectability, only to bolt to a better job after just three seasons.
The Beard hire is a good one, but we don’t know how it will affect Clergeot’s commitment or the attitudes of the younger players already on roster.
Final Numbers to Know:
9 – The number of key contributors currently slated to return next year. There isn’t a lot of extra space for new names unless someone leaves, but the existing group has enough talent to hang in the 5-to-7 place range in the Big 12.
52% – The proportion of threes made from the guys that will be back next year. Gotcher and Williams took the majority of shots from deep, but Ross, Gray, and Evans should have the green light to shoot more often with more minutes on the perimeter. Thomas and Williamson are the next most likely candidates to shoot more often thanks to increased playing time.
92 – The number of blocks that Zach Smith has accumulated in his two seasons of college ball. He is Texas Tech’s hardest working forward and will be asked to keep the effort up with a new coach coming to town. There’s a lot to like from Smith and if he develops some more post moves next season, he could gain much more national attention.