Busting Brackets
Fansided

NBA Draft 2022: Live scouting report of top Big Ten Basketball prospects

COLUMBUS, OHIO - FEBRUARY 19: E.J. Liddell #32 of the Ohio State Buckeyes celebrates after dunking the ball during the first half against the Iowa Hawkeyes at Value City Arena on February 19, 2022 in Columbus, Ohio. (Photo by Emilee Chinn/Getty Images)
COLUMBUS, OHIO - FEBRUARY 19: E.J. Liddell #32 of the Ohio State Buckeyes celebrates after dunking the ball during the first half against the Iowa Hawkeyes at Value City Arena on February 19, 2022 in Columbus, Ohio. (Photo by Emilee Chinn/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
3 of 6
Next
Michigan State’s Max Christie NBA Draft Syndication Lansing State Journal
Michigan State’s Max Christie NBA Draft Syndication Lansing State Journal /

Max Christie – Freshman – Michigan State – 6’6, 190 lbs – February 2003

Christie’s season has been marred by inconsistencies, as his game largely depends on shot-making right now. Against Illinois (in Champaign), Christie struggled against Trent Frazier, who has been a great barometer for how potential NBA players in the Big Ten handle ball pressure and a tight airspace.

Christie has good positional size and length for a wing (with a frame to continue to add more weight) and the shot mechanics look really good, they just don’t always fall. Illinois didn’t give Christie many open looks, but his lack of handle in tight spaces was exposed as he struggled to get to the rim.

He finished 1-8 from the field with no assists, which isn’t an uncommon statline for him. He’s been up-and-down all season. Christie’s projection will come down to how good of a shooter he truly is. While the mechanics look great, he hasn’t always been a consistent, knockdown shooter dating back to high school. His steal, block numbers haven’t been great, but that’s largely a reflection of Michigan State’s scheme. His length and awareness project him as a positive defender, but if he can’t hit threes super reliably, his value is minimized.

Christie will be one of many prospects with an interesting decision to stay or leave. He could choose to return and improve his 31% percentage from deep and continue to improve on-ball and become a lottery pick. But, I’m not convinced he wouldn’t be a similar-caliber player. I also am not sure Michigan State is the best system for him to grow on offense with limited on-ball reps.

His pre-draft process, and how teams view him will ultimately be the determining factor, and I’d likely take him in the first round if he declared, banking on him eventually becoming a knockdown shooter.